Wake Up America!

June 26th, 2008

Wake up - stop complaining about the war and start helping those who are fighting it.

Today, Move America Forward is hosting a huge drive to send more than $500,000 worth of care packages to the troops overseas. You can help with this effort.A lot of things are going to be happening today.

There will be a Jerry Lewis style 8-hour Internet Telethon (”From the Frontlines”) on June 26th (from 4:00pm - Midnight - Eastern). This cutting edge production “From The Frontlines” will be broadcast live by UStream.tv and hosted by Melanie Morgan & Michelle Malkin. Live and taped reports will be broadcast from our troops serving in Iraq & Afghanistan during the historic 8-hour event. We are also deeply honored that Former First Lady Nancy Reagan has also signed on to support the “Candy Diplomacy” portion of this effort!

CLICK HERE for complete details regarding the “From the Frontlines” 8-hour telethon that takes place on June 26th.

MMEDIATE RELEASE June 10, 2008

DoD Announces Recruiting and Retention Numbers for May 2008

The Department of Defense announced today its recruiting and retention statistics for the active and reserve components for the month of May.

· Active Duty Recruiting.

· May Monthly. All services met or exceeded recruiting goals for the month of May (below) and have surpassed goals for fiscal 2008 to date.

May 2008 Accessions Goal Percent
Army 5,568 5,500 101
Navy 2,983 2,983 100
Marine Corps 2,656 2,172 122
Air Force 1,888 1,888 100
  • Active Duty Retention. Army, Navy, and Marine Corps continue to enjoy excellent reenlistment rates and are meeting or exceeding goals across the board.

· Reserve Forces Recruiting.

· May Monthly. Five of the six reserve components met or exceeded their accession goals for May 2008. The Army National Guard, which is already at (109 percent) of its year-to-date goal, finished the month at 94 percent of its May goal, reflecting an Army decision to have the National Guard strength at its authorized level.

May 2008 Accessions Goal Percent
Army National Guard 5,311 5,635 94
Army Reserve 2,893 2,697 107
Navy Reserve 817 817 100
Marine Corps Reserve 923 923 100
Air National Guard 892 680 131
Air Force Reserve 638 636 100

· Reserve Attrition. Losses in all reserve components are within acceptable limits.

Detailed information on specific recruiting data can be obtained by contacting the individual military recruiting commands at (502) 626-0164 for Army, (210) 565-4678 for Air Force, (703) 784-9454 for Marine Corps and (901) 874-9049 for Navy. The reserve components can be reached at the following numbers: National Guard Bureau (703) 607-2586; Army Reserve (404) 464-8490; Air Force Reserve (703) 697-1761; Navy Reserve (504) 678-6055; and Marine Corps Reserve (504) 678-6535.

Transitioning into civilian life is not the easiest thing to do. I’ve done it and I can tell you, for many, it takes a while. When I see a program like this one, it shows me that someone cares - and someone understands,

The Little Caesars Veterans Program was created to thank veterans for
their service, and provide them with career opportunities when they
transition to civilian life or seek a career change. It offers honorably
discharged, service-disabled veterans such as Slater, who qualify as Little
Caesars franchisees, a benefit of up to $68,000. Honorably discharged,
non-service-disabled veterans who qualify as Little Caesars franchisees are
eligible for a benefit of $10,000.

    "With talented veterans such as Michael joining the Little Caesars
team, the Little Caesars Veterans Program continues to grow and provide
veterans with business ownership opportunities," said David Scrivano,
president, Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. "The skills Michael honed in the
military, such as teamwork, dedication and a familiarity with processes,
will help him become an effective Little Caesars franchisee."

    Since launching on Veterans Day 2006, interest has remained high for
the Little Caesars Veterans Program. Currently, 30 veterans have been
approved to become Little Caesars franchisees and more than 2,000 inquiries
have been made about the program. Several more U.S. military veterans are
expected to open stores under the program in the coming months.

We like Little Caesar, but like most folks, we buy pizza from wherever the closest deal is. Not anymore. I will drive the extra five minutes for a Little Caesar Hot and Ready and some Crazy Bread.

Russia has hedged its lead as the most prolific arms dealer in the world  (yes, even more than the US) with a recent agreement with Venezuela.

 Oil-rich Venezuela is a major purchaser of Russian weapons and hardware. In 2005-2006, Venezuela ordered weaponry from Russia worth $3.4 billion, including 24 Su-30MK2V Flanker fighters, Tor-M1 air defense missile systems, Mi-17B multi-role helicopters, Mi-35 Hind E attack helicopters and Mi-26 Halo heavy transport helicopters.

Russia has repeatedly stated that it will actively participate in the modernization of the Venezuelan armed forces until 2013.

Kommersant said negotiations were underway on the purchase of 10 Il-76 Candid military transport planes and two Il-78-MK aerial tankers for the Venezuelan Air Force. The contract will be worth a total of $600 million.

Deliveries will be completed next year. The aircraft will replace six outdated American Lockheed C-130H Hercules transport planes and two Boeing 707-320C aerial tankers.

Venezuela and Russia have also agreed on the purchase of four Kilo-class Project 636 diesel submarines. The terms of the deal, estimated at $1.2 billion, were negotiated late last year.

The Project 636 submarine is designed for anti-submarine warfare and anti-surface-ship warfare, and also for general reconnaissance and patrol missions. It is considered to be one of the quietest diesel submarines in the world.

The strategic problems having (very quiet) Venezuelan submarines patrolling the Atlantic and Caribbean oceans should not be overlooked. To me, this is akin to Russia placing strategic missiles on Cuba.

Set aside the pre-war statements by prominent Democrats about the need for regime change in Iraq. Set aside, the post invasion castigation of our “reasons for the war”. Set aside the attacks by prominent Democrats on our military. They attack using every angle of their geopolitical virtual reality as possible.

The simple truth is the leftists in America will not be disabused of their silly positions on Iraq by the facts.

But Democrats said President George W. Bush, who began the war five years ago and who will leave office in January with more than 100,000 troops still there, was failing to focus on the bigger threat of al Qaeda from the Afghan-Pakistan border.

“Protecting this nation from direct attack is job number one, yet our allocation of forces does not match this imperative,” said Rep. Ike Skelton, chairman of the House of Representatives’ Armed Services Committee.

The implication is the Iraq is detracting the US from the threat of terror attacks in the US. Really?

  • Jose Padilla was interdicted at O’Hare airport - we was returning from Pakistan and had been recently messing about with nuclear materials.
  • The Lakawanna  Six were apprehended for plotting an attack after having trained in Pakistan with AQ.
  • Eleven men - four of whom plead guilty - were apprehended in Virginia for working with AQ and the Taliban.
  • Dhiren Barot was apprehended for plotting to blow up major financial institutions, including the NYSE, after training in Pakistan.
  •  James Elshafay and Shahawar Matin Siraj were arrested for plotting to bomb a subway station in New York City.
  •  Umer Hayat and Hamid Hayat were arrestedafter the Hamid’s attendance at an Islamic terrorist training camp in Pakistan.
  • Assem Hammoud, an al-Qaeda loyalist living in Lebanon, and others, was arrested for plotting to bomb the New York City train tunnels.
  • A plot to blow fuel pipelines that runs through residential neighborhoods at the Kennedy International Airport in New York City was foiled.

Combine your knowledge of these instances with the simple fact that NO terrorist attacks have occurred on US soil since the invasion of Iraq. Add, as a seasoning if you will, the fact that AQ had a substantial subsidiary operation in Iraq. That AQ found it more desirable to attack US forces in the Middle East than to attack the US itself.

If the Democrats were serious about securing America from the potential of terrorist attacks, they would be more active in securing the borders. They are simply posing yet another childish “Nya!” to something they philosophically have no ability to understand.

I don’t do book reviews.  I leave that to smart people.  However, I do spend a lot of time trying to figure out what is going on in the world around us. 

This week we have seen another phase of the war in Iraq.  The Iraqi military is attempting to assert its influence and regain control of the country.  We are going to be able to see pretty soon if the training and equipping we have done were enough and whether there is the political will by the Iraqi government to enforce its sovereignty over its territory.  Our forces are still there in a supporting role but it appears that a decision has been made to try to allow the Iraqis to take the lead.  When they are able to do this, we can realistically start talking about our forces coming home. 

While I was in law school I did not have much time to read about how we got to the position we are in with regard to Afghanistan and Iraq.  I think it is important to understand this because we are on the verge of electing a new president and new members of Congress.  Much of the political debate this year will concern what mistakes were made and what we should do in the future.  Much, if not all, of the commentary will be politically biased.  A great deal of the discourse will come from people who don’t know what they are talking about and who don’t think you are smart enough to find out for yourself; the old “Trust me, I will solve the problem” approach to politics.

It is interesting that histories of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are being written so soon.  In past wars we had reporter accounts created during the war but it generally took twenty years or so before the substantive histories were written.  Thankfully, that is no longer the case.  Now it seems that everyone has at least one personal computer, a good word processor program and we have the Internet to spread the word. 

I think it is great that we can understand how our national policies are formed in such a current fashion so that we can actively engage our political leadership to reflect the views of the American citizens.  However, it puts the responsibility on each of us to be accurately informed and not depend on the media commentators and various news sources to digest our history for us and only give us the information they want us to have.

I recently had the opportunity to read several books which provide a lot of insight and useful information to help me better understand what happened in the decision making process at the national level in the aftermath of the attacks of September 11.  If you are as concerned about our national security as I am, you might want to spend a little time gathering facts about what really happened.

If you decide to read these books, please remember that each of the authors and editors writes and publishes these books from their own perspective; they were participants and they have a story they want to tell.  Historians apply the filters of history to produce their works.  The products are different.  Don’t take any single source of information as the gospel.  However, these three books serve as a good basis for understanding much of what has happened in the last six years with regard to our national response to the September 11 attacks.  I am sure there are many others and you might choose to enlighten me about what you have read as well.  I will take a look at whatever you recommend.

I have included links to reviews that present contrasting views of the books.  This clearly shows that there are widely varying opinions on what the “facts” really are.  Also one more note:  Don’t read Cobra II if you are not ready to admit that George Bush’s administration and our military leadership have made mistakes in the conduct of the war.  Cobra II is the best of the three books but you will probably be disappointed, frustrated or outraged that many of the mistakes described in the book were allowed to happen.

 Here are links to reviews on three books I think are important to understanding how we got to where we are in Iraq and Afghanistan:

1.      American Soldier, by Tommy Franks, HarperCollins/Regan Books, 2004. $27.95. 

Review located at:

·        http://www.strategypage.com/bookreviews/229.asp and

·        http://www.bookreporter.com/reviews2/0060731583.asp and

·        http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/bookrev/franks1.html

 

2.      At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the C.I.A. By George Tenet with Bill Harlow, HarperCollins, 2007. $30.

Review located at:

·        http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/28/books/28kaku.html?_r=1&ref=books/oAn%20Ex-C.I.A.%20Chief%20on%20Iraq%20and%20the%20Slam%20Dunk%20That%20Wasn%92t/t_blank&oref=slogin

·        http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OWVjNjgyOGZiYzBlMzFlYTM3YTg4OGQ3NTBhYjc4NjQ=

·        http://www.dougfeith.com/coverage_6.html

 

3.      Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq, by Michael R. Gordon and Bernard E. Trainor, Random House, 2006. $27.95

Review located at:

·        http://www.nationalreview.com/owens/owens200604170810.asp

·        http://www.powells.com/review/2006_04_20.html

·        http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/30/books/review/30heilbrun.html?ex=1304049600&en=ffc80747ae84f966&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss.

Benny

Redouble Afghan Effort

March 29th, 2008

The war effort news from Afghanistan has been backgrounded by - well - just about everything. However, there are a few of us keeping an eye on things over there. In the Intelligence Community (IC), people make a lot out of “chatter”. We might not know what they are talking about, but there are changes in the volume of talking that might point to something happening.

My view is that the news is not really so different. Taking all of the “story of the moment” aspect out of the picture, you can look over the landscape of the news and get an idea of changes in the world. To my way of thinking, there are changes which have been going on in Afghanistan for some time - things we really need to jump on now.

A couple of years ago, the Taliban was decimated and the survivors were deep underground. They dared not show their faces, 72 virgins or no. Now, you see Taliban strikes on a very regular basis. They are gaining confidence with every bomb or ambush they succeed in carrying off. I am not saying this change in the battle space dynamic is because of the change from US to NATO prosecution of war against the Taliban, but the coincidence (or Ko-inki-dink as we used to say) is certainly there. I am also not saying we need a “surge” in Afghanistan. This is not an attempt to REMF Quarterback the operation. I would not know any more what to do to “redouble the effort” than I would know how to groom a llama. I am speaking of this completely holistically.

My feeling is we need to stop talking about our efforts to bring and/or retain other countries in the “war on terror” and get back to taking the fight to the bad guys.

Club GITMO

March 24th, 2008

Remember all of those pictures from the news agencies of Camp Xray in Guantanamo? Lots of chain link fence, and orange jump-suited guys with hoods on their heads kneeling on the ground awaiting processing? Anytime you see news about GITMO - even today - those pictures tend to accompany the story.

Would it surprise you to know that Camp Xray has been deserted since 2002? It was only open for a few months, while other facilities were being built.

Of the camps currently in use, none come close to justifying the concerns of the Gitmo’s critics, let alone Amnesty International’s feverish judgment that it is the “gulag of our time.” Visiting Camp 4, Gitmo’s medium-security compound, one can see detainees walking about freely. And though the fact that many of the detainees wear unruly, Islamic beards is slightly disconcerting, it is consistent with the military’s intention to make their detention as comfortable as possible under the circumstances.

But of course, the news reports certainly convey the sleep deprivation and inhumane isolation of the many thousands of detainees.

Toward that purpose, Camp 4 offers a number of diversions, courtesy of American taxpayers. There is an outdoor basketball court, and a 6,000-book library, from which detainees can check out everything from hobby magazines like Bird Watcher’s Digest, to commentaries on Islam, to Agatha Christie thrillers. The latter come complete with white stickers blocking the author’s photo, lest the detainees deem the grande dame of the mystery novel too much of a seductress. “By western standards it wouldn’t be very offensive, but [the detainees] would have a problem with that,” explains Julie, Gitmo’s head librarian, somewhat apologetically. Detainees can also check out DVDs–nature documentaries and international soccer matches are particularly popular–and a flat-screen television is available at the camp for viewing. And, just as American troops stationed on the base can take academic and vocational courses, Camp 4 has a special classroom where detainees can learn English, Arabic, or Pashtu.

Special care is taken to allow detainees to practice their religion, which is invariably Islam. A kit of provisions issued to Camp 4 inmates includes not only bare necessities like a toothbrush and a uniform, as well as luxuries like prescription glasses and electric razors on selected days, but also prayer beads and oils, and a Koran that guards are under no circumstances permitted to handle. It is a measure of the deference–one might even say reverence–shown to the Muslim holy book that the military doesn’t even provide a sample copy on a display table of representative items shown to journalists. “Out of respect,” explains an officer in charge of Camp 4, who declines to be identified for security reasons.

To be certain, it would be very one-sided of me to only cite this article - which is a first hand account by the way - as it relates to the medium security accommodations.

Less hospitable conditions might be expected in camps 5 and 6, Gitmo’s maximum-security complexes. To some extent, that is the case. With a narrow bed, a metal sink, and a small slit for a window, the cells in Camp 5 are no one’s idea of paradise. Within those confines, however, the detainees are granted substantial privileges. Climate controlled, the cells come equipped with a communications system that allows detainees to talk to the guards. Beneath the beds, one finds stenciled arrows pointing to Mecca, and detainees can elect their own imams, or prayer leaders–a concession that may well favor more extreme elements in the detainee population but which the military is nonetheless determined to grant.

Perhaps the most curious room at Camp 5 is furnished with a plush blue couch for the detainees. Were it not for the leg restraints at its foot, one might never guess that this is where interrogations take place. Of the steel-floored cells were detainees are alleged to be beaten for information there is not a trace of violence. Those who consider Gitmo an affront to international law might also be surprised to learn that Camp 5’s recreation yard not only has news bulletins from the Middle East but also a prominently displayed copy of the Geneva Conventions. While Gitmo is not officially governed by the treaties, the military makes every effort to make sure that detainees are treated in accordance with them. There is even a so-called “habeas room” for detainees to meet with their counsel. A gulag, plainly, this is not.

Even Camp 6, home to the most dangerous of Gitmo’s approximately 275 detainees, confounds the image of excessive confinement and ubiquitous brutality with which the naval base has come to be identified. True, the recreation facilities here are smaller and indoors, and the two-hour (minimum) exercise time less generous, but it would take a willful disregard of the evidence to see it as a U.S.-run “concentration camp.” Not the least of the reasons for that is that the military guards on duty here, as in other Gitmo camps, go out of their way to minimize the use of force. Trained to contain a mass riot, the guards actually spend most of their time trying to diffuse confrontation. “It doesn’t have to get physical,” insists Shawn Johnson, a guard at Camp 6.

Yeah - I know. I am being unfair. Because, in spite of all of this the detainees are still treated roughly and the air conditioning is set super super high to make it extremely uncomfortable for the detainees.

This is not to deny that abuse is a problem Gitmo. It’s just that most of it is done by the detainees. “The only mistreatment that goes on inside the camps is detainees on guards, and the guards absorb it without retribution,” says Army Brigadier General Greg Zanetti, Gitmo’s deputy commander. Zanetti notes that while many of the detainees have been here for five to six years, more than enough time to discover the best way to harass their captors, many of the guards are just weeks or months into their post. “For a while there, it’s an unfair match,” Zanetti says.

Underscoring the general’s point are some disturbing figures. In 2006, for instance, there were over 3,000 recorded incidents of detainee misconduct, instances which included 432 assaults with bodily fluids, 227 physical assaults, and 99 efforts “to incite a disturbance or riot.” That certainly suggests that Gitmo is a dangerous place, just not in the way its detractors imagine.

I think Jacob Laskin makes a good point when he says:

One source of conflict stems from the fact that, in contrast to journalists, lawyers for the detainees are not granted tours of Gitmo’s camps. It is not surprising, then, that the more outrageous claims about the treatment of the detainees and the conditions inside the camps more generally issue from those least familiar with them.

But then, the military is trying to respect the obligations we have with regards to how these detainees are treated. Parading them in front of the American public is in direct contravention to that.

Thanks to our military

March 19th, 2008

I just want to say thank you. I believe in you and I believe in your mission.

God Bless you and keep you safe.

F-117 Nighthawk Retires

March 12th, 2008

Present, Arms!

Washington, D.C. (AHN) - After decades of faithful service, the United States Air Force (USAF) says it will retire the world’s first stealth fighter jet, the F-117 “Nighthawk.” The twin-engine, single-seat fighter demonstrated the tremendous capabilities of stealth when it helped Coalition forces expel Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi military from Kuwait in the Persian Gulf War.

Order, Arms!