It always amazes me just a tiny bit how liberals will take something completely obtuse and turn it into “another ramification of global warming”. This time it is Jo Tuckman for the Guardian. She’s been cited by Michael Moore as a source for the “Bush stole the election” meme and now her latest global warming rubbish is being pontificated upon by every leftist website in the world as a fact.
The headline is wonderfully dramatic: Global warming brings busy year for UN disaster teams
Here is the direct quote that created the headline - you’ll love it.
Of the 14 global missions, 70% were in response to hurricanes and floods, the OCHA statement said, calling this “possibly a glimpse of the shape of things to come given the reality of climate change.”
Jo Tuckman was able to translate this single vague “maybe” into a direct correlation between global warming (not climate change) and tropical storms. The interesting thing is that global warming has largely been dismissed as a cause of tropical storms and has even been theorized to decrease the strength of tropical storms and hurricanes. Especially since the IPCC and WMO published a study refuting the correlation between global warming and tropical storms in 2006.
Consensus statements by the workshop participants
1. Though there is evidence both for and against the existence of a detectable anthropogenic signal in the tropical cyclone climate record to date, no firm conclusion can be made on this point.
2. No individual tropical cyclone can be directly attributed to climate change.
3. The recent increase in societal impact from tropical cyclones has been largely caused by rising concentrations of population and infrastructure in coastal regions.
4. Tropical cyclone wind-speed monitoring has changed dramatically over the last few decades leading to difficulties in determining accurate trends.
5. There is an observed multi-decadal variability of tropical cyclones in some regions whose causes, whether natural, anthropogenic or a combination, are currently being debated. This variability makes detecting any long-term trends in tropical cyclone activity difficult.
6. It is likely that some increase in tropical cyclone peak wind-speed and rainfall will occur if the climate continues to warm. Model studies and theory project a 3-5% increase in wind-speed per degree Celsius increase of tropical sea surface temperatures.
7. There is an inconsistency between the small changes in wind-speed projected by theory and modeling versus large changes reported by some observational studies.
8. Although recent climate model simulations project a decrease or no change in global tropical cyclone numbers in a warmer climate there is low confidence in this projection. In addition, it is unknown how tropical cyclone tracks or areas of impact will change in the future.
9. Large regional variations exist in methods used to monitor tropical cyclones. Also, most regions have no measurements by instrumented aircraft. These significant limitations will continue to make detection of trends difficult.
10. If the projected rise in sea level due to global warming occurs, then the vulnerability to tropical cyclone storm surge flooding would increase.
Although the debate continues today about everything from the cause of climate change to the actual impact of climate change, there is nothing - nothing - which concludes that global warming is in any way related to the strength or frequency of tropical storms - even in 2006. The opposite seems to be true.
Scientific experts, however, agree that global warming is not a factor in the current spate of hurricanes. Nor is the trend likely to get worse. Scientists from Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, told the Post (Sept. 3), It’s a fact that nobody so far has been able to show from the observed storms a tendency to have more intense storms. Kerry Emmanuel of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology told UPI on September 20 after another hurricane had hit, The intensity of current hurricanes such as Ivan cannot be attributed to global warming.
One widely reported study (by Knutson and Kuleya, published in the Journal of Climate) did suggest that, A greenhouse gas induced warming may lead to a gradually increasing risk in the occurrence of highly destructive category-5 storms. However, the study appears flawed in that, to begin with, it estimated growth in greenhouse gas concentrations at 1 percent per year, rather than the currently occurring 0.4 percent per year, which results in much higher concentrations by mid-century, which is when the risk of destructive storms is supposed to increase.
More recent study seems to indicate that global warming may actually decrease the strength of Atlantic hurricanes.
Subscribe to NPI


New anti-hurricane technology from Slovakia
WEATHER MACHINE
PCT/SK2006/000003 (WO/2006/085830) A METHOD OF AND A DEVICE FOR THE REDUCTION OF TROPICAL CYCLONES DESTRUCTIVE FORCE
documents - http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?wo=2006085830
THE INVENTION relates to a method of suppressing the tropical cyclones’ destructive force characterised in that the ascendant speed of wind in a tropical cyclone’s eyewall is reduced by sea water pumped on-site from under the sea surface above the sea surface and diffused in the wind at the bottom of such tropical cyclone in/near its eyewall. The invention also describes a facility for the application of said method.
Antihurricane Technology Fund
http://www.ahtfund.org
Fund support development, testing and propaganda of technologies that are capable of avoiding spontaneous catastrophes or decrese them in size, fundraising.
Hurricane active technology prevention
ENERGY FROM HURRICANE VERSUS HURRICANE
No doubt that global warming is very debated. I, however, have never heard that man is causing global cooling. For this - all I can say is that I hope that the people that believe this is natural are not wrong. But if man is causing at least part of the problem then why not do all we can. One thing not in dispute is that we cannot continue to use non-renewable sources on energy forever.
Are you familiar with the ground floor movement to take solar to the masses by a company called Citizenre? They are trying market solar with an approach similar to satellite TV, cellular telephones, and alarm systems. That is to provide the customer a complete solar system with no upfront charges and make money from a service contract. In this case the service contract would be a rent agreement. They intend to put a complete solar system on clients home. When the system produces electricity, it will lower the bill from the current utility provider. In most cases the savings from the lower bill will more than cover the rent fee that the company intends to charge. The company currently has no product available but intends to deploy in the middle of 2008. They are currently taking reservations and have over 26,000 takers so far. I have written several articles on this company in my blog and even have a couple of videos that I have recorded at http://www.solarjoules.com. Feel free to take a look. I welcome comments. As in any start up business, a chance exists that they may never get off the ground and fulfill any preorders, but if this is the case - the potential client has not lost anything. If you cannot afford the upfront cost of solar today, this may turn out to be a great alternative. This solution would mean that we could produce at least a little less pollution and would be a great step “just in case”. And hey, the fact that you will save money on your electricity bill over time is a pretty good reason to look into it as well.
If anyone would like company information you can go to http://www.jointhesolution.com/razmataz.